I guess that most serious students and writers would agree that AI is a helpful tool when it transmits actual information from an actual document, without the collateral input from other sources. I realize that collateral input is helpful in some situations, but when looking for exact reporting, it is essential to eliminate extraneous information.
I sometimes go to an AI program and ask questions about Biblical information. It is not for study purposes, but for research into current and/or popular theological, doctrinal and religious issues.
Up to this point I have found that AI tends to answer Biblical questions by referencing Scripture itself (instantly), but then it goes into interpretations, popular views, "expert explanations," which it has gleaned from millions of sources around the world. However, when I persist in asking for a Biblical response, it politely concedes that my premise is accurate. Usually this leads to another level of discussion and more extraneous information. Still, I continue to ask for the Biblical position or Biblical record without collateral sources. AI eventually acknowledges my actual premise as being accurate and consistent with the Biblical position.
It is totally different when I am talking with a person who is arguing for a man-made belief system. I often talk with cultists and sinning religionists who constantly leave the actual Biblical record and refer back to their pet doctrinal position or so-called historical scholarship.
As AI will move further into the Super AI format there will be less conversation and more domination, which is what I run into with the actual ARTIFICIAL INTELIGENCE manifested by those who deny Biblical truth and cling to the false teachings of men.
I can make a Biblical statement to false teachers, and they will deny it. I can show the passage to false teachers, and they will explain it away. I can present a plethora of evidence, and they will revert to logical fallacies, claiming that those fallacies disprove what is clearly recorded in the Bible. When dependent on Biblical evidence, AI has no choice but to accept truth.
I have had interesting interaction with AI concerning the doctrines of Christian Perfection, Christ raising Himself from the dead physically, the Deity of Christ, Biblical holiness. When confronted with unwavering commitment to Biblical truth, AI agrees with the facts of the case, unlike my encounters with people who hold to the false doctrines of men at all costs.
There will come a time when AI becomes as dogmatic about error as humans are. This will happen because of biased programming and popular algorithms. In the meantime, I am having more honest interactions from a machine that has almost instant access to almost endless documentation, than I have with people who claim to believe the Bible.
No comments:
Post a Comment